Conventional Waste Collection Method |
Automated Waste Collection Systems (AWCS) |
Garbage odour and spillages. |
Waste is disposed through the chutes and outdoor loading stations, directly transported via underground pipes to a sealed container. |
Pests like flies, roaches and rats. |
Sealed container prevent pests from accessing the garbage. |
Large amount of garbage trucks on the road. |
A flatbed armroll truck collects full container from the Central Waste Handling Facilities (CWHF) located away from the inhabited area at specific times. |
Intensive low skilled labour force. |
Waste is transported using vacuum technology. No additional labour is needed. |
Public complaints for better service levels. |
The convenience of waste removal directly from inhabited area, less public complaints and a more hygienic environment. |
Managing and cleaning bins and garbage rooms. |
Easy to maintain Central Waste Handling Facilities (CWHF) with no open bins. |
Space for storing waste. |
Valuable space within the development can be allocated for other building purposes. Less space is required to store waste, which can be consolidated from several buildings. |
Multiple truck collection points. |
One truck collection point. |
Infrequent removals. |
Frequent removals which eliminate stench of rotting garbage. |
Lack of punctuality. |
System controlled by preset timer and/or waste level switch. |
Environmental issues. |
Cleaner and healthier environment, encourage recycling, supporting environmental policies, low CO2 emissions. |
Mixed waste leads to an increase of landfills. |
Waste segregation into recyclable and non-recyclable, smaller landfills. |
Higher operational costs due to multiple collection points. |
Lower operational costs due to single collection point. |
Security issues. |
Safer environment since there is no additional labour needed. |